A case analyze of the exoneration of the defendant

Pages: 3

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

The OJ Simpson case was one of the most publicized circumstances of all time. Persons know of the truth and the judgement, but many people do not know the elements of the crime or perhaps if there were even enough evidence to prove having been guilty further than a reasonable hesitation. The legal defenses utilized were sketchy but the defense ultimately developed their circumstance around this. The jury came to a decision based on evidence provided and ultimately chosen to exonerate the defendant.

OJ Simpson was supposed to convert himself into the LAPD in June 17th, 1994 yet he would not show up after saying he’d. A brief law enforcement officials chase occurred later for the reason that day leading to Simpson quietly surrendering whilst being considered into custody of the children. The case began on The fall of 2nd, year 1994 by the court swearing in, to beginning statements upon January twenty fourth, 1995. The former football legend was attempted on two counts of murder to get the deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Simpson, and her good friend Ronald Goldman in Summer of 1994 (Linder, 2000). On Summer 20th, Simpson was arraigned and pleaded not guilty to both killers (Linder, 2000). A likely cause ability to hear was held to determine whether or not to create Simpson to trial and July seventh it was made a decision there was enough evidence to deliver Simpson’s circumstance to trial for the murders (Linder, 2000). In the next 99 days of trial, the criminal prosecution brought forwards 72 witnesses. After a extended trial the verdict came on Oct 3, 95, the court returned a verdict of not guilty. Shortly after the simple verdict, Simpson was a part of a civil trial where it absolutely was determined that he had wrongfully caused the death of Ronald Goldman and Nicole Simpson. The jury purchased Simpson to pay large numbers (Ayres, 1997). This case highlight some several things from ethnicity attitudes about issues including law enforcement that still exist inside our country today, to getting rid of light upon domestic violence, and lessons in just how not to operate a criminal trial.

In the O. L. Simpson trial, Mr. Orenthal James Simpson was charged for two is important of killing. It was presumed that Mister. Simpson murdered Ms. Nicole Brown Simpson and Mister. Ronald Lyle Goldman in June of 1994. Mister. Simpson’s trial began on November two, 1994 and a consensus was reached on August 3, 95, in which Mister. Simpson was found not guilty on almost all charges. There were several different aspects of the offense. The fb timeline was identified to be very interesting as in the beginning Mr. Kato Kaelin testified that this individual saw Mr. Simpson within the dark sweating suit for the property before the occurring of the murders. A neighbor testified that he did not discover Mr. Simpson’s Bronco for the premises in the Rockingham home as Mr. Simpson reported to the authorities that he was at his home at the time of the murder. (The tough was believed to have occurred among 10: 12-15 p. m. and the 15: 40 s. m. ) During this time, Mr. Simpson was scheduled that must be taken to the international airport however , having been not at your home.

Mister. Simpson had a motive when he and Ms. Nicole Darkish Simpson were still married and the girl was linked to a marriage with Mr. Ronald Goldman. There was GENETICS evidence belonging to Mr. Simpson found on Mister. Goldman at the picture of the offense. There were clothes found in your home of Mister. Simpson that contained Ms. Brown-Simpson’s bloodstream. There were a lot of pieces of proof which suggested that Mr. Simpson was guilty of the murders of Mr. Ronald Goldman and Ms. Nicole Brown Simpson. However , the prosecution put a large amount of emphasis regarding the bloody glove available at the offense scene as they suggested the glove would fit the hand of the accused. The glove did not fit the hand of Mr. Simpson, therefore the prosecutions argument failed.

In this case there was significant evidence that suggest that Mr. Orenthal James Simpson was guilty of two counts of murder over and above a reasonable uncertainty. There was sloppy police operate and discredited witnesses that concluded that Mister. Simpson has not been guilty further than a reasonable doubt.

The defense used many tactics in make an effort to prove OJ Simpson wasn’t able to have fully commited the crime. OJ Simpson in fact chosen two attorneys who centered on DNA proof to try to confirm the police were careless with evidence and caused cross contamination of evidence. That they claimed internal police procedures are what caused GENETICS evidence to become contaminated. Additionally they claimed there was more than one group of footprints on the crime picture and attempted to utilize a racial defense. Lawyer Johnnie Cochran goaded the prosecution in having OJ Simpson put on a pair of mitts that were proof to demonstrate they do not match him (Linder, 2000). The defense attemptedto use a circumstance that two hit men were employed by medicine dealers. They will tried to claim Nicole Simpson and Ronald Goldman were murdered just because a friend, Faye Resnick, did not pay her drug supplier to for drugs your woman received. The judge did not accept the claim and stated the security did not present enough facts that the scenario was possibly possible. The defense tied to the DNA evidence as their defense and attempted to explain the fact that OJ Simpson was crippled with osteoarthritis and could not have committed the crime. OJ Simpson’s defense was legitimately viable. The process of DNA has not been perfect during the time and the assortment of evidence was questionable which in turn helped the defense build and prove their case.

In the initial trial OJ Simpson was identified not guilty coming from all charges because of the defense utilizing racial security, the fact it turned out more than one pair of footprints at the crime field, and the fact that OJ could hardly fit the glove donned during the criminal offenses. However , within a civil trial that was filed by family of Nicole Simpson and Ronald Goldman deemed OJ to be responsible for their wrongful deaths. Within this civil trial OJ was called towards the stand to testify wonderful story appeared to be contradictory, and even more evidence come up since the criminal trial. The defense would have filed a motion to exonerate the prices based on the prior verdict of not guilty in previous trial. Also the newest evidence shown could be circumstantial. The shoes that have been worn following your trial would not support that he used them prior to. Lastly the defense would have preventing him testifying to get his best interest. Once the noticed the case was leading to a guilty end result, he could have discussed a plea discount to prevent disbursing so much in punishable fees to the family. The amounts order by courts was obviously a bit intense as OJ was not actually worth what he was so that it will pay. OJ Simpson at that time was well worth $15 mil and ordered to spend about $25 million in damages (D. A, 1997), that is almost double his worth. Consequently entering a plea could have given OJ the ability to request a lower charge within his means.

The felony trial of OJ Simpson attracted a whole lot of multimedia attention. OJ Simpson was charged with two counts of homicide of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. As a result of discredited witnesses, sloppy law enforcement work, as well as the defenses strategies in the case he was exonerated of all charges.

Related essay

Category: Law,
Words: 1287

Views: 440