Plantation society in the caribbean today essay

There is even now evidence of the plantation society within the modern Caribbean World. This evidence can be seen by first studying various areas of the plantation system or perhaps society, including the; lifestyle, mentality, social structure and financial model linked to this sociable system. Then a comparison will probably be made between plantation and modern Carribbean societies regarding these factors, to show all their relevance in the modern Caribbean culture.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

The time of slavery which took place in the Caribbean during the sixteenth to 19th centuries implement a social and political order which in turn formed the social composition and course related standards of living of the plantation system.

The social framework of the plantation society was static and pyramidal in design. Towards the top of the interpersonal pyramid was your white ruling class or perhaps the planter school which contains the light plantation owners and those who were closely connected with them. Directly under the white colored ruling course was the mixed or mullatto population together with the poor whites and cost-free people of colour, who also still contributed to social fabric of the culture despite not having much politics power.

At the extremely bottom in the social pyramid was the Grayscale nonwhite time class and within this course itself persisted racial divisions and a labour structure.

Therefore , it might be seen coming from examining the different classes in the plantations system’s social framework that the plantation society was composed of different ethnicities. Generally a major area of the labourers were Africa, but because of the various ethnic groupings inside the plantation societies across the Carribbean, these societies were considered to be culturally plural. This populace mix affected the character of society in lots of ways such as in how that certain social groups will only be found together when ever there was an economic related activity. It was consequently not uncommon to look for on a plantation society several racial and cultural teams living hand and hand but as well having little social or perhaps cultural sex. Another exampleof how the figure of the culture was affected by the population mix is visible from the fact that during this time whomever was the owner of the plantation was automatically deemed the super-ordinate group in the wider society as well as the plantation personnel were from the subordinate group. Social and economic electric power was focused with the super-ordinate group, and therefore real politics and legislative power got only resided with these people.

Before analyzing the political development or lack thereof, we need to first consider the social construct as well as relevance to today, throughout the plantation age the world was made of a majority of not skilled workers, huge areas of land devote to creation and the functioning class was excluded from majorly centralized decision making due to the rigid interpersonal hierarchy. Today we can even now see proof of the working course being omitted in this way and today to a lesser but still significant extent due to a to some extent rigid cultural hierarchy, exactly where evidence of this can be seen by difficulty show move up the social step ladder and comparatively minor work needed to preserve ones social standing.

Keeping in mind the explanation of the social construct in the past, let’s consider the changes which ensued ultimately causing the present day version, the cultural hierarchy transferred from a rigid to a forcefully mobile phone structure which has been brought on by all of the changes caused by emancipation and the mass immigration that followed, conditions for improving ones sociable standing relocated from the colour of one’s skin to a fewer rigid despite the fact that still tough criteria to incorporate educational, occupational and financial status, an additional change which usually allowed for the differences in the post emancipation period was the individual bankruptcy and accompanying migration with the whites back to Europe producing space for the upward movement of both shaded as well as black individuals with the social scheme of things but also inside the political industry leading to a boost of colored individuals in power and a decline in white control at least directly. By the latter part of the 20th century, these types of middle classes (mostly the black and brown educated and professional elite) controlled the leadership positions of personal parties and states throughout the region.

The evolution of the colored midsection class to power lead to many significant struggles while using white forces, these struggles included the struggle to get greater democratic participation intended for the majorityblack population and the struggle pertaining to political freedom from Western european control which was eventually accomplished at least physically though it is quite debatable that mentally the Western european control persist, the conclusion of political power and independence by national black and brown top-notch did not actually shatter the foundations of white dominance, superiority throughout the region. Although it can be said that see there has been wonderful changes ultimately causing the physical political emancipation of modern-day society from that of the planting society the economic electric power was still inside the hands of the expatriate light ownership classes even following political self-reliance was won in the 1960s, and the Caribbean ethnicity formations created by captivity and colonialism are still intact.

From a fiscal standpoint we are able to also declare the plantation is still with us. During the period of the plantation we found two specific developments, one particular was the plainly distinct at standstill economical structure which ultimately evolved inside the times of emancipation to a a bit mobile cost effective hierarchy in both forms the distancing factor was clear contest and kind of education, putting your white planter class at the top and the liberated or slaved blacks at the bottom, the different characteristic was your clear aim of the overall economy not to better the public but to improve or increase the profit for the plantation, these two primary characteristics from the economic plantation society remains to be seen today, although due to hierarchy mobility blacks have already been allowed to rise in status they are really still crystal clear restrictions to this such as the need for a European education to make this in world meaning that even though black the best tier blacks are profound within the effect of the Western european mentality.

Therefore the majority of the high end economically standing up people are still white and the majority of the reduce class are black typically in keeping with the economic couche of the planting society. the other characteristic with the plantation contemporary society which was the net income of the plantation which today would be the earnings of the corporation can still be observed and is make clear in various ideas where we can see that the operating class is still exploited for the profit with the higher category and is allowed by the personal power to make the rich richer as well as the poor poorer which can be believed to also contribute to the clear differences and problems associated witheconomical hierarchy. the persistence of these traits as well as the seeming acceptance of them as normal is apparent evidence of the persistence in the economical plantation society today.

Caribbean communities today could be seen while plural societies, some more than others. Present day plural societies can be seen on islands such as Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana and Suriname. The actual pluralities of the modern Caribbean societies can be seen as a divisions of race, racial, religion and cultural variations, to mention a few major components while others like economic disparities and personal membership can be seen to create division. In societies today there remain in existence a pecking order of cultural class; the upper class, midsection class as well as the lower class. The upper category is a top of the line group of people who have occupy the best position inside the social hierarchy. The members of this interpersonal group are wealthy and could have great social and political electric power and impact. The middle class is socio-economically located between the upper class as well as the lower class and comprises of a group of people in the contemporary culture. The lower course also called the significant class comprises of the asociado economic organizations who are often working for low wages and would include the skilled and unskilled workers.

The middle and working classes make up the world while the upper class is seen as the minority nevertheless the upper class still holds the majority of the polical and social electrical power within the contemporary society as was with the plantation society where hierarchy was divided inside the super-ordinate plus the subordinates. Folks are born right into a class framework and it is difficult to leave the social clump on an upward movement. One example is people created in the prestige structure will be more than likely to stay in that structure for entire lives and in the middle and lower classes during your stay on island still is a small chance of changing their cultural status. The hierarchy that embodies the plantation society is apparent in your today’s contemporary society in housing, jobs, life styles, prestige, color of skin, image, prosperity, opportunities, education and qualifications to mention a few factors.

Real estate is among the class splitting up embodies the hierarchy of class. Some neighborhoods are just special to people of the prestige. For example the gated communities exactly where in that area there is a gate separating that neighbourhood in the surrounding neighbourhoods. Alsothere happen to be neighbourhoods which might be exclusive for the working course, for illustrations developments and housing areas. Racism continue to exists in society today but to a smaller extent in which some People continue to be denied jobs and positions because of the colour of their epidermis and also chosen for jobs based on along with of their skin. In many companies the owners are whites who are of the upper social class and their subordinates are people from the operating classes and middle classes.

It can be explained therefore that from a social structure and a cost-effective standpoint there are remnants of the plantation contemporary society in the Caribbean today however there’s also been various changes which include social range of motion and politics control making today’s culture different is definitely some methods but related in many as a result of a plantation society

Criticism of the planting society version

The plantation model/theory in identifying the characteristics from the social and political framework of plantation societies offers provided coming from critical errors; Theory does not provide a path for moving forward or fighting the unfavorable remnants of the plantation society. Does not look into its evaluation the effects of the injection of other racial/cultural groups including the Chinese in these plantation societies. Once again the assumption of the theory is that plantation societies will be homogenous. Will not take into account the effects of migration on the demographic, financial and cultural patterns which in turn emerge inside the post-emancipation age.

Does not think about the activities to combat ethnic, political and economic discrimination mounted simply by local community centered organizations including the, land cooperatives, the UNIA and the time movement in the 1930s. Does not account for the introduction of a considerable afro and indo-peasantries which in turn existed inside the post emancipation period which saw land moving into the hands of black and additional nonwhite groupings. a crucial group within the matrix of the stated society and economy was ignored; this is the poor whites and the free of charge people of colour. Choice implicitly argues that this group did not contribute to the social, personal and economical organization with the plantation contemporary society. By disregarding this group the evaluation of the plantation societies mainly because it existed under slavery is definitely skewed toward the small white eliteand significant African/East Indian labour force; which were certainly not the only.


Sidney Watts. Mintz: “Caribbean Society.  c. late 1960s Encyclopedia of the Social Savoir. David Watts 1987 The West Indies: Patterns of Development¦ Beckford, George. The Plantation Unit in Christine Barrow and Rhoda Reddock (eds. ) Caribbean Sociology: Introductory Readings. Ian Randle Publishers; Kingston Jamaica, 2001. Best, Lloyd. “The Contribution of George Beckford.  Social and Economic Studies. Vol. forty one, No . 3, September 12 ISSN: 0037-7651. “”””-“Models of the Pure Plantation Economy.  Social and Economic Research. Vol. 18, No . 3, September 168. Thomas, C. Plantations, Cowboys and Point out, ISER, U. W. I actually, Mona, 1984.


Related essay

Category: Law,

Topic: Contemporary society, Electric power, Upper class,

Words: 2129

Views: 476