Purpose and effectiveness of police patrol essay

To begin studying this topic Let me provide a brief definition of a patrol expert. In police, patrol representatives are uniformed police officers designated to patrol specified geographic areas. They are the officers in most cases encountered by the public. Their very own duties contain responding to demands service, making arrests, resolving disputes, acquiring crime reports, and conducting traffic observance, and other criminal offenses prevention steps. The patrol officer may be the first on the scene to reach. What they do or fail to do at the scene can tremendously influence the end result of an investigation.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

The patrol officer, as the person daily in the field, is definitely closest to potential criminal offense and often has most likely developed connections that can provide information which may assist in resolving the criminal offenses. The general aim of police patrols whether on foot, bicycle, horse back or motor vehicle is to have a visible occurrence in the community, maintain public order and a feeling of security in the neighborhood, build human relationships with people and businesses, and prevent crime especially in trouble spots.

The fundamental activities of these patrols will be divided into four different classes.

Preventive Patrol ” By managing a occurrence in a community patrol officials prevent crime from occurring. This usually accounts for about 40% of the officer’s time. Calls For Service ” This is when officials are answering 911 demands emergency support, or different citizen challenges and grievances. This accounts for approx. 25% of the officer’s time

Administrative Duties ” This is the basic paperwork of the job, and takes up about 20% from the officer’s period Officer started activities ” These are incidents in which the patrol officer initiates contact with residents such as producing traffic ceases, checking on anything suspicious, asking citizens etc . This usually makes up about about 15% of patrol time.

These types of percentages will be national averages and may differ widely amongst police departments.

The question is how effective will be these authorities patrols? Very well it seems for all depend on what report you read. Although researching this kind of topic I came across many departmental reports that might suggest that their very own efforts helped reduce criminal offense substantially in targeted areas while other reports suggest that police patrols are not fully effective in controlling criminal victimizations, and that police patrols do not decrease the actual quantity of offences that occur.

Some of the authorities department research I browse had patrol officers focusing on just one criminal offense, such as guns, drug, terme conseillé, impaired motorists, etc . The results of the reports were generally favorable and showed a reduction, at times substantial, in a single particular region.

An example of it was with the Kansas City Police Department. A study was conducted to measure the effectiveness of the Kansas City PD Gun Experiment, in which added police patrols focused on firearm detection. Between July 1992 and January 1993, police

patrols had been increased in gun-crime “hot spots,  and cops assigned to the target region concentrated exclusively on gun detection through proactive directed patrol. Data for the same period was obtained for a assessment area in which no changes were made inside the number or perhaps duties of patrol representatives. In the focus on region, authorities seized 66 percent even more guns by July through December 1992 than in the first six months of 1992. In contrast, firearm seizures by police in the comparison region declined slightly in the second half of 1992. In the target area, weapon crimes decreased significantly inside the latter part of the 12 months, whereas they increased a bit in the comparison area.

These types of findings suggest that a law enforcement department can easily implement a program through increased police patrols to boost seizures of illegally carried weapons in substantial gun-crime areas. Other authorities departments reported success with similar programs, and the reports were always backed up with data and statistics that enable that you draw a logical conclusion.

Towards the contrary, some of the reports I discovered that would suggest general law enforcement officials patrols will not be that successful don’t seem to have credible data attached to these people leaving area for halving. Law enforcement administrators have typically relied in three (3) indicators to measure agency effectiveness also to determine how much funding pertaining to particular operational programs such as increased law enforcement officials patrols.

Initially, crime stats always have played an important role in rendering direction to police companies. But , simply by relying on criminal offenses statistics as conclusive proof that particular programs or perhaps philosophies happen to be achieving their very own anticipated outcomes, observers generally fail to ensure that these statistics accurately reveal what they claim to measure. For instance , some politicians often view decreases in crime because indicators of successful programmatic responses to funding focal points, and even though the converse can often be used while justification for added funding, some long-range studies suggest that law enforcement agencies have got little control of increases and reduces in criminal offenses. This is therefore , researchers believe that, because the police have no control over the sociological conditions which can be blamed to get fueling the expansion of criminal offenses.

As we discovered from the textbook “Criminal Proper rights In Action Social Process Theories state that the major affect on any individual is certainly not society generally, but the interactions that rule everyday life, therefore the learning and labeling hypotheses. For this reason, the application of crime figures as an evaluator of program accomplishment or as an indication of money well spent may possibly inherently be inadequate. Second, measuring the amount of satisfaction with the police has been an organizational concern for decades and usually is accomplished through surveys, personal interviews, and by annually calculating the numbers of sustained inside complaints. Even though these data-capturing mechanisms contain inherent biases and may carry little benefit when utilized as answers of offense or additional antisocial habit, police organizations continue to use them as valid measures of agency effectiveness. This is the case even though, via a historical point of view, citizen attitudes on the police have not been susceptible to change resulting from the level of patrols, nor happen to be attitudes on the police considerably affected afterpolice-citizen encounters.

In other words, there is little that can be done, a lot more than temporarily, the current proclivity for individual satisfaction or dissatisfaction while using police or perhaps police patrols. Third and last, the popularity of crime prevention because an signal of achievement among police program managers is easy to understand. To refute the effects of avoidance strategies could require a exact measurement of crime that did not arise. Moreover, it might be reasonable to anticipate that the standard of criminal activity in a offered community can be equal together with the attention paid out to it by law observance. To the level that neighborhoods can apply an ever-increasing proportion of shrinking federal government resources to a relatively select few of receivers, the level of pleasure can be expected to keep favorable. Similarly, the use of crime prevention stats also will remain popular provided that municipal governments continue to give funding on the basis of this measurement.

The lacking ingredient within the current community-based police patrol paradigm seems to be the lack of focus on traditional police force responsibilities. Tiny has been created, for example , regarding using confidential informants, stakeouts, intelligence-gathering and aggressive motor vehicle stops together, with adaptable organizational set ups to respond to criminal activity. Although constantly updated data regarding offense trends and patterns is essential to any this sort of attempt, problem solver should not be limited to youth crime or specific neighborhood dysfunctions. Community policing and problem-oriented policing could be successful within a larger circumstance involving every member of the organization.


Although the fine art of policing including law enforcement patrols is promoting a great deal during the last several many years, and continually change particularly with regard to personnel application strategies and new solutions, relatively little attention continues to be paid for the way in which administrators deal with employees or define productivity in a structured, environment. A management philosophy that sets guidelines but promotes solutions by “rank-and-file is usually infinitely even more desirable when compared to a system that discourages, although unintentionally, the innovative and creative worker. Together with powerful measures that more accurately confirm police successes, a new

management idea can come out.

The application of community policing courses within this framework, however , is most beneficial accomplished through aggressive enforcement, a “case-to-fruition mentality, the use of the flexible company structure strategy, and good sense. The tendency to use law enforcement methods exclusively to specific residential areas to the exemption of others should also be avoided in favor of encouraging person officers to utilize the resources available on every call for service. Within an integrated patrol approach, change commanders believe a difficult, but ultimately integral, role. They need to know their employees, encourage their employees’ activities, gauge the results reasonably, provide advice and support, and work to maximize the potency of the team. Simply by combining intense enforcement using a comprehensive community-based orientation, law enforcement officials agencies can easily unleash officers’ full imaginative power to battle crime.


Gaines, Larry K. & Miller, Roger LeRoy, “Criminal Justice For action The Core Fourth Edition, Wadsworth 08

Police Quarterly Vol. 6th No some, December 2003, Policing Techniques and Awareness of Law enforcement officials Legitimacy Sage Publications the year 2003

Wells, L. Edward, & David N. Falcone. Designing a Comprehensive Empirical Model of Policing in the United States, 1996-1999 [Computer file]. ICPSR04338-v1. Normal, IL: Illinois Point out University [producer], 2006. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium pertaining to Political and Social Study [distributor], 2006-09-06.

Travis, Lawrence Farreneheit. III, & Beth A. Sanders. EFFECTS OF COMMUNITY POLICING ON RESPONSIBILITIES OF STREET-LEVEL POLICE OFFICERS IN OHIO, 81 AND mil novecentos e noventa e seis [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Cincinnati oh., OH: College or university of Cincinnati [producer], 1997. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Holding for Political and Sociable Research [distributor], 1999.

Pate, Antony M., & Sampson To. Annan. COMMUNITY POLICING IN BALTIMORE, 1986-1987 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Buenos aires, DC: Law enforcement Foundation [producer], 1990. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium intended for Political Study [distributor], 1998. Brownfeld, Allan C. “A Strong Police Presence Prevents Crime.  Rival Viewpoints: Offense and Scammers. Ed. Tamara L. Roleff. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2k. Opposing Views Resource Centre. Gale. University or college of MD University College or university. 20 Monthly interest. 2008 F Law Enforcement Bulletins, v64 p4-5 May, 1995, The Kansas City Gun Research Retrieved April 20, 2008



Related essay

Category: Law,

Topic: Criminal offense, Criminal offenses, Enforcement officials,

Words: 1827

Views: 223