660-833-5563

State and Federal Marijuana Legalization Essay

This paper will focus on the state of hawaii and Federal marijuana legalization from 3 scenarios and analyze the retributive, commutative, and distributive justice of these three scenarios complex circumstances. First scenario will be a “recreational pot cigarette smoker, who lives in a state that recently legalized growing, possessing, selling, and distributing, through state-regulated dispensaries, limited amounts of marijuana pertaining to medical use”(Ashford University online school site, 2013).

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

Second scenario “a parent residing in the same state, concerned that her 12-year-old will be exposed to fresh and significant risks of addition of pot that will be readily available in their community” (Ashford University on the web school website, 2013). Third scenario is the “Chief of Police in the city wherever these people live, who has urged the City Authorities to sanction new local zoning and also other regulations that will make it nearly impossible for medical cannabis dispensaries to control in the city” (Ashford College or university online university website, 2013). First, allow us to look at the particular definition happen to be for retributive, commutative, and distributive proper rights.

Retributive rights “is the right response to those who have acted unjustly, commutative justice is a reasonable exchange-through deal, covenant, or perhaps other agreement- that fulfills the legal rights and responsibilities of all parties involved, plus the distributive justice is proper rights in the division of goods and services” (Driesbach, 2013). The first circumstance of a “recreational pot person who lives in a state that recently legalized growing, possessing, selling, and distributing numbers of marijuana for medical use” (Ashford University online school website, 2013). Retributive proper rights is seen with this scenario, while the pot cigarette smoker will unjustly misuse legislation because the weed smoker uses it for recreational use and not for medical purposes.

Retributive justice is seen by having a “showdown among state and federal regulators that will not concentrate on individual uses of the medicine, instead concentrating in fresh regulations that will aid marijuana sites permissible a violation of federal law” (Guarino, 2012). Commutative proper rights seen in this is the pot smoker uses it for recreational use will see this as an ok to work with the leisure marijuana since there is now a binding deal that says marijuana is usually legal. Yet , this law passed by simply voters in a few states “could set the states on with a major with the federal government, removes criminal sanctions for anybody 21 or older obtaining 1 ounce (28. five grams) or perhaps less of pot for private use” (Myers, 2012).

Distributive justice observed in this scenario is the pot person uses cannabis sees that, as products (marijuana) were made available. “In Colorado the distributive justice can be viewed to a recreational pot smoker because marijuana, (goods) of touch being sold can be legal to acquire in one’s possession” (Clement, Craighill, 2012). The second circumstance of “a parent residing in the state, concerned that her 12-year-old will be seen new and significant likelihood of addition to pot that will be readily available in their community” (Ashford School online university website, 2013). Retributive rights in this scenario will make lifestyle a little less difficult for the parent in the event ones advertising the pot approach her child.

Retributive justice will certainly promptly manage people who served unjustly regardless if at State or National level. Commutative justice in this scenario gives the parent tips and laws and regulations to protect her child trigger in place there is certainly laws created with legal binding deal to protect her child if perhaps child runs into an undesirable pot cigarette smoker trying to pressure pot within this 12-year-old. Set up are regulations of joining contracts to shield ones like the 12 year old.

Distributive rights in this scenario even though the goods (marijuana) is created available father and mother need to speak to his or her children about “do not use drugs, these types of conversations regarding drugs are actually more important to have now, says Dr . Leslie Walker” (Parasher. 2012). The third scenario, the “Chief of Police with the city in which these people live, who has advised the City Authorities to enact new local zoning and also other regulation that can help it almost impossible for medical marijuana dispensaries to operate in the metropolis uses the retributive justice cause the primary of Police is trying to keep it where that after people have done wrong that they will suffer the consequences” (Ashford University on-line school web page, 2013).

However , on the condition side with the city which has passed the legalization of pot, it can be legal nevertheless the Chief really wants to uphold the federal part to what remains illegal. Commutative justice in this scenario that even though the express has a reasonable exchange with a contract the Chief wants to maintain the national laws in the contract also that states it is against the law. With two binding deals the Chief is in a win-lose spot. The main of Law enforcement can succeed in his favor from the federal government side and lose on the state side because most the ballots from the culture legalized pan.

Distributive justice in this circumstance is the place that the Chief of Police is attempting to make the dispensaries nonexistence with upholding the federal area saying it really is illegal even though the state says they have the justification to put up dispensaries. In exploring the way that moral personality may inform the actions or choices of each of these central actors is with the leisure pot person he would come under the meaningful character of “regularianism that holds that the act is just and therefore morally good, if this obeys a rule and unjust, and for that reason morally awful if it violates a rule” (Dreisbach, 2013).

In the situation of the parent the meaning character will be “objectivism, the views that moral value brings to the thing being justified” (Dreisbach, 2013) as is with the parent since morality is known as a personal concern. In the scenario of the Chief of Authorities would be “subjective meaning I really do not approve” (Dreisbach, 2013). In conclusion, in the way to achieve one of the most just quality to concerns involving the availability of marijuana in American society is no easy question to answer specifically someone who does not support the legalizing of pot in a state.

However , this daily news deals with state and federal legalizing and so in respect to trying to arrive to some kind of terms involving the state and federal every ones should come together together and associated with laws in legalizing of marijuana available but in more alternatives on how plus some way to create it legal for non-supporters and supporter’s.

Related essay

Category: Law Abuse,

Topic: Essay Topics, Proper rights, State,

Words: 1128

Views: 423