The moon and sixpence by w somerset maugham

This extract from “The Moon and Sixpence” by W. Somerset Maugham is usually written by vibrant, ironic dialect. It is with regards to a poor specialist, whose art were regarded by contemporaries absurd. Plus they were much surprised when ever dealers coming from Paris and Berlin began to offer to them the huge amounts. Strickland did not make impression on people, for islanders he was simply a “beach-comber”, different from others only that he came strange photos. It is impossible to tell that he formed relationships with people.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

He not merely didn’t enjoy material benefits, but likewise consciously info refused: this individual refuses act as soon while earns in paints and a painting. However , all the debts, this individual tried to come back and if could not give money, offered the pictures. Hence the picture also got to Cohen. Cohen was a Jewish dealer, Maugham describes him because “little aged Frenchman, with soft kind eyes and a pleasant smile, half dealer, half seaman…”.

He is good-natured, friendly.

But inspite of seeming simpleness, Cohen is usually not a basic man; he could be a wealthy, with very good business perspicuity. He pities the poor, untalented, in his judgment, the specialist and not only provides it with work, but also therefore borrows cash, without looking to receive these people back. Cohen emphasizes his love pertaining to the music artists and even shows the proximity to the world of artwork. “I have always had compassion for music artists. It is inside our blood, you know”. The writer in the text plays a role of the observer; he pushes the interlocutor to increase development of a plot. Maugham doesn’t offer own remarks, any accurate assessment to Strickland’s creative imagination. He expands the character through descriptions of other people, every once in awhile sneering by them. Occupants of the tropical isle found Strickland’s pictures odd and incomprehensive, and they had been very astonished when about them there was a demand.

Of course , the relation to the paintings changed dramatically. Although people will not regret which often not identify the wizard in a stroller who resided near. They will regretted the lost chance to buy his paintings to get pennies, that in a outcome to earn on them. Not the old Frenchman, nor his wife would not understand the picture presented to them for debt. They have not even considered hanging this in the house, Cohen honestly will. “People might laugh at us”. As well as the fate of canvas could have ended in the rubbish, if not for Cohen wife, who under no circumstances throw anything away. And the picture was forgotten in the attic for many years. The author mocks people’s frame of mind to art incomprehensible to them, that may be unlike on habitual, it seems to them wrong.

The main shortcoming, according to Cohen’s better half was in not realness of the landscape: “… it doesn’t look like the plantation and I have never seen cocoa-nuts with green leaves…” The writer shows not only narrow perception of the partner of the seller but also her close friend, who having received a photo, solved that it is joke. “I would not have given the price of postage for the picture. I used to be half afraid to show it…” In the textual content practically there is absolutely no description in the picture, heroes admit that don’t understand this, a material was kept in mind only because off the cost which was offered for it. And it isn’t surprising that associated with a towel the word “money” infinitely adjoins. The author reveals rigidity, inflexibility of people, it is hard to them to accept something totally new, it is difficult to be beyond the habitual.


Related essay