War on terrorism is 1 term paper

War On Terror, Vietnam War, Conflict, Civil Battle Women

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

Research from Term Paper:

(Reese, Killgore Ritter 22)

Another well documented myth is that Iraq and some active terrorist corporation, of which War is not one, have taken advantage of from the grave of the Soviet Union, through the proliferation of Soviet weaponry scientists and the knowledge.

A another fear of WMD proliferation was through Soviet “brain drain. inch Yet there has been no open-source evidence indicating that WMD materials or know-how has reached terrorist hands from the break up of the former Soviet Union. [61] Though the potential proliferation of guns and competence has to be considered genuine, several elements mitigate the danger of chem-bio defectors. 1st, most chemical and natural scientists who departed the Soviet Union have emigrated to the United states of america, Britain, His home country of israel, and Indonesia for industrial jobs. Second, there is no facts to claim that scientists have alternately attended Libya, Syria, North Korea, or War to sell their weapons expertise. Third, several confidence may be gained through the professionalism and ingrained reliability culture in the scientists. Last, many scientists have as well as cultural ties that make moving into Pyongyang, Damascus, or Tripoli less interesting than remaining in Russia. And even in which isolated occurrences have occurred, the individuals are typically in contact with express officials, not really terrorist businesses. (Weiss 117)

The producing truths manage to somehow get away the public as well as the U. S. government when creating decisions for the entrance of the U. S. Within a full scale and almost single invasion of Iraq in addition to fact the myths persevere and even elaborate by added myth creation of a direct social, politics and financial connection between Saddam Hussein and Ing Qaeda or perhaps at the very least Osama Bin Stuffed. “The CIA has been not able to tie War to the Sept. 2010 11 episodes. Cheney speculates about a ‘potential marriage’ between terrorist organizations such as Al-Qaeda and War. But simply no concrete proof of a link has been forthcoming. inches (Cohn 25) in other words there is no real connection between the Iraq government and Al-Qaeda other than the fact that terrorist organizations’ ideologies, just like those of Al Qaeda, resemble many others and are fed simply by U. H. aggression which will it recognizes as misguided and central to assaulting the principles of Islam. (Cohn 25)

New York Occasions, January 28, 2001, A2 (Secretary of State Merlu Powell says no facts links Saddam Hussein for the September 10 attacks); James Risen, “Iraq – Dread Acts by simply Baghdad Have Waned, U. S. Aides Say, inches New York Times, February 6, 2002, A10 (“The Central Intelligence Agency has no evidence that Iraq has involved in terrorist operations against the Usa in nearly a decade, plus the agency is usually convinced that President Saddam Hussein have not provided chemical substance or biological weapons to Al-Qaeda or perhaps related terrorist groups, in accordance to several American intelligence representatives. “). (Cohn 25)

Although there is tiny doubt among even the many ardent of war supporters that the U. S. attack of Iraq will act as not a stage of resolution of terrorist activity but fodder intended for continued terrorist hatred of U. H. aggression and potentially further more acts of violence, we could now and so invested in the war that little can be achieved to extricate the U. S. with out creating further destabilizing forces in the region.

In other words the politcalization and propagandizing of this turmoil, that allowed it to begin with on the event of American anxiety about 9/11 like attacks happening in the future, has established a situation where there is no uncertainty that they will. The U. H. led war on Iraq, can serve as ammo for the existing and rapidly to be extremists that would be more than likely to harm the U. S. And her international interests in the foreseeable future. There are currently so many hits against the U. S. With this list that there was tiny real need to add more to the hitch, though out of dread and misdirected ideas we all seem to did just that by invading Iraq and continuing to be seen and represented as blind aggressors against Islam. (Preble 20) the Abu Ghraib jail scandal is merely one example of how a picture is worth a thousand words and how the world will likely always see the U. S. Since an attentatmand. “The stunning abuse and sexual humiliation that occurred at Abu Ghraib jail in the year 2003 and 2005 was the job of “corrupt cops” whom acted for his or her own satisfaction and without the sanction with their commanders… inches (Kiehl NP) Regardless of their particular representative “sanction” by supervisors these men and females openly awkward the stringent cultural beliefs of Islam are using the outfits of U. S. troops and which represents the whole. They are the pictures that will endure and fee the fundamentalist camps that breed of dog terrorists. There was many images available to fundamentalists prior to this event but the new ones provide not to control the situation nevertheless feed the ideology of international hatred for the aggressive U. S.


The foundational reasons for the war on terror are actual, and an affordable course should be taken to decrease this risk, in a multi-causal and multi-solution manner, although reaffirming that there is some interconnection between the Korea war and the war on terror is irresponsible to say the least, because the truth has become evident for more than the length of the Iraq conflict itself that the repercussions of the aggression may worsen instead of diffuse the specific situation. It has recently been clear for quite a while that there is simply no connection between Iraq plus the terrorism that has already shaken the foundation from the nation. Individuals who argue that it is sometimes darkest prior to dawn and that there is a have to make things worse prior to they can improve need to reevaluate their thinking and recount the destructive toll on this modern U. S. aggression.

The surprising truth that emerges via Clarke’s bank account is that after 11 Sept, the Bush administration did not see worldwide terrorism like a threat but since an opportunity. That enabled the White Residence to secure the support from the U. H. public, plus more perplexingly regarding Downing Road, for a great invasion of Iraq inaccurately packaged within the “war upon terrorism. ” (Cook 34)

Despite the fact that the U. S. public, plus the Congress had been capable penalized dissuaded to generate a connection that did not exist those who view it from one other perspective, i actually. e. these seeking to locate ammunition to reiterate their very own belief that the U. S. is an aggressor that needs to be stopped in any respect possible weren’t fooled. The early response to Sept. 2010 11th in political and social circles was to locate and satisfy the culprits with retaliatory actions. In the beginning after the episodes, many inaccurately contended that there was a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda, incidents where supported the concept a war against a known condition conspirator (in this case Iraq) was warranted, even though the same individuals most often cried intended for evidence just before action. One particular researcher possibly furthered the opinion that the idea of terrorism, as a condition sponsored function, should be reaffirmed in politics ideology, despite the fact that at least a decade of evidence is definitely contrary to these kinds of state sponsorship. (Mylroie 24)

What took place is just that, the U. S. could further the idea that state sponsorship of terrorist activities was evident, and even as the pieces of info associated with this conclusion were rapidly and successively shot down the furtherance of the trigger against one person state was furthered and now we are involved in a warfare that has little if any bearing about terrorist episodes, of the past. The result, as was believed by many will not be a more secure U. H. But an even more vulnerable one and so the connection between Korea and terrorism has now recently been cemented not really by any real previous conspiracy for Iraq to attack the U. S. On September 11th although by adding fuel to the flames of future and present ideological ideas with considered to U. S. window blind aggression against Islamic international locations and teams. In a wager to makes things better, we have built things more serious, and carry on and do so, without having end in internet site.

The current “war on terror” will likely get a blight around the history of the usa, just as the Vietnam battle yet, with even more convoluted issues, to find the nature of the “enemy. inches There is little to create a perception that there is a genuine connection between a defined condition with described borders and a common opponent. Though we have a clear feeling that there are people who allow or even support the introduction of the extremist views that feed terrorism, and yet it would appear that these are not the people who are conversing or which represents an independent country.

The terrorist attacks on September eleventh are the only real reason why there were initial support for the actions from the (Western) foreign community in aggression toward Afghanistan

Related essay

Category: History,

Topic: Other words, Saddam Hussein, Soviet Union,

Words: 1609

Views: 173