Beowulf and the thirteenth warrior dissertation

Beowulf and the 13th Warrior, the two are very very good stories, 1 legibly and the other aesthetically (unless you visit the beginnings of the 13th Warrior and read Eaters of the Dead). Although it can be pretty apparent to all those who have read Beowulf that the 13th Warrior was based on fantastic epic, you may still find several dissimilarities that make to get an interesting angle or two.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

As the two stories are very much alike in numerous ways, also, they are very different.

Among the key differences that the reader/viewer notices right off is that the account of Beowulf is being informed exclusively aboutBeowulf and his antics¦ almost in a third person view. The 13th warrior, on the other hand, is being told by aparticipant (Antonio Banderas who also plays Ahmed Ibn Fahdlan) in the actions about the symbolic Beowulf character. Antonio Banderas or Ahmed Ibn Fadlan, is an Arabian ambassador via Baghdad whose whole goal in going is tointeract with and learn as much as they can about the “odd and “uncultured methods of the Vikings.

Though he starts out pretty raise red flags to, almost horrified, about how the Northmen carry on with their philistine customs and almost complete deficiency of hygiene of almost any form. The reason that Antonio Banderas’s character is even area of the story is that the Vikings’ leader, Buliwyf, requires a 13th gentleman that may not be a northman to be included in his posse of adventurers.

The goal of the adventurers is usually to report to a great aging “King Hrothgar that help him to guard his people from a tribe of savages (you almost feel that they as well are “supernatural because there are never any of their very own dead remaining after fight and they are continually riding about inbear skin that give these people a favorably frightening appearance in the mist andat night) that are leading to anincredible sum of terror (I’d always be pretty frightened too merely walked to a friend’s cabin and him and his family were cut up into pieces) and totally destroying the people; Grendel is the embodiment of all the so-called savages, whilst his only having himself, he and so terribly lessened the population and established this kind of a status, that he successfully made king Hrothgar move out of his cherished mead corridor.

While there are a variety similarities inside the stories, a single very important details to notice is a parallel among Mr. Buliwyf and Beowulf (both of them are leaders of soldiers and they both hurry to the help of a troubled king in whose kingdom is within danger). Along with, both of these leaders of males make it their objective to go and kill the “mother (“mother of the savages and Grendel’s mother).

In Beowulf, the hero truly fought and killed Grendel (“eaters in the dead head and savages combined) initial and then when his mom (“mother of the “eaters from the dead) came up and carried off his body system to her residence in the pond, Beowulf adopted and then killed her because well¦ but I suppose the order doesn’t really matter.

Another concern to notice is the parallel in “supernatural occurrences and traits in the two stories.

In Beowulf, he had supernatural power, there was nobody and nothing on the globe that was strong than he was (he tore Grendel apart¦ actually, and Grendel was a demon which I picture is no convenient feat). The parallel to that particular in The 13th Warrior was how even after Buliwyf was diseased just before he cut off the “mother’s mind, he nonetheless was able to combat through the poisonous haze and muster the strength (even nevertheless everyone believed he was very muchdead inside the town hall) when the time came, and fight off the vengeance being sought by “eaters with the dead intended for killing their very own “mother. 

After this individual dispatched using a couple of savages, he ups and downs his blade at the head and does not just strike him and knock him off (he’s wearing chest armor hence the sword does not cut him in half), he provides enough strength not only to make an effort to knock the leader off his horse, but makes him fly off about 10 toes in the opposite direction that he was originally trying to head to get to Buliwyf.

The comparison of the way that the fighting men in all the stories look at fighting is likewise interesting. In both tales, pride and boasting and “manliness plays a very important function in the way things are done. Whetheryou fight or perhaps not generally seems to directly impact whether you are a “man or perhaps not. The warrior code is a great imperative part of any good impressive, or warfare story in general¦ there has to be a “good guy that, no matter how negative what this individual does is, follows some type of exclusive chance code, that may be an integral part of an excellent story.

One more very apparent difference is the fact in the thirteenth Warrior, Mr. Ahmed Ibn Fahdlan is usually not the primary character ofthe story, although in Beowulf, Beowulf is actually the one the storyline is about. While the viewer watches the 13th Warrior, they will observe that Antonio Banderas serves as the focal point/narrator of the film, even though the story isnot about him. This truth becomes painfully obvious towards end of the movie, prior to the climactic battle, in which the main persona (the the one that is representational of Beowulf), Buliwyf, not directly asks Antonio to write down the storyplot (Mr. Banderas actually seems to offer to copy it straight down so that their very own story is definitely not forgotten) and Ahmed Ibn Fahdlan says it can be done (you actually get the feeling it’s almost a “get well surprise because Buliwyf is going to pass away from poison). So , despite not being the key character, he plays an essential role¦ not only in the duplicating down of the story but also because he is the reason these were able to deposit the savages.

One very obvious big difference (not sure what the owners were thinking) was that there were sort of aminiature love story sort of arbitrarily thrown in the 13th Soldier. There actually seems to be no point to that, it really features nothing to perform at all while using main level of the movie¦ possibly it was a weakened attempt to entice a femalecrowd (despite the gore) simply by claiming it turned out, in part, a love history. Overall, it causes one to get distractedfrom the point¦ and it merely requires creates more questions then it answers.

Whilst one story is obviously a remake of some other, they have their own, extremely acute, variations. And while the 13th Warrior doesn’t almost come close to being of the same quality of a account as it could have, and there are still several parallels with Beowulf that crazy it exciting (obviously apart from the action which would make it enjoyable anyway).


Related essay