Camp david accords an instance study in

Gaza, Jerusalem, Excellent Minister, His home country of israel

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

Excerpt by Case Study:

Camp David Accords

Camp Davids


There are several equipment of statecraft which can be grouped as economical, military or perhaps political in nature. Discussions, International laws and regulations, alliances and public diplomacy are the main instruments of politics employed by the politicians to resolve the difficulties and problems at national and international levels. This kind of paper covers how the politics tool of statecraft utilized by nations around the world to solve the issues.

Negotiations take place when two or more than two parties make use of the diplomatic means instead of armed forces means to settle a problem, issue or issue that is shared by both of them[footnoteRef: 1]. Negotiations ought not to be confused with the reconciliation or perhaps compromise, by which one party wins and also other losses, however it is actually a negotiating process, conducted by each in order to get the economic and territorial benefits. [1: Hopman, Terrence. Bargaining and Problem-Solving: Two Perspectives in International Arbitration. Washington. Thrashing Peace: The Challenges of Managing Intercontinental Conflict, 2001. p. 457]

This paper discusses the famous case of Intercontinental Negotiations “The Camp David Accords” which has been the end result of the 13 day series speaks held in November 1977. These types of negotiations were mediated by America, to fix the issues among Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Judio Prime Minister Menachem Begin. This case is recognized as as one of the greatest lasting and an effective discussed agreement among Israel and any Arabic country. There were many important factors and interest of both nations; Egypt and His home country of israel which brought these two antagónico players in the ground in making agreement and stable tranquility on behalf of their very own nations.

There were several arguments regarding the fascination of both nations and their role in this game. This kind of “Camp David Accords” case gives the lesson of diplomacy and reveals how the diverse instruments of power (finance, economic, info, diplomacy etc . ) are being used by the nations in the negotiating process to attain their goals and passions.

This conventional paper discusses in greater detail the role played simply by Egypt in this instance, the strategies used by it in the bargaining process and its interests to do the contract. The last section of the paper will even discuss how successful was Egypt in achieving their goals.

Thesis Statement: The Camp David Accords talks between Sadat, Carter and Begin show impressive implementation of the instruments of power and they are rich together with the lessons of diplomacy for individuals.

Before continuing, it is important to learn; what were the basic issues to deal with Camp David. Subsequent were the four fundamental issues[footnoteRef: 2]: [2: Telhami, Shibley. “Evaluating Bargaining Performance: The Case of Camp David. ” Personal Science Quarterly. vol 107, no four. 1992-93. Pp. 629-53. ]

1) To indication a tranquility treaty and normalize relations between Egypt and Israel

2) To remove Israeli armed forces troops via Sinai Peninsula

3) To fix out the issues and link them with the continuing future of West Lender and Gaza

4) To produce a statement about principals, including the disengagement of Israel from all of the territories which it has entertained and give the self-determination privileges to the Palestinians


The steps used by Egyptian President might seem surprising in this case but if functioning in detail we discover out the particular were in fact the best techniques available to him and this individual choose a perfect strategy for resolving the issues.

The first step taken by President Anwar Sadat was going to Jerusalem; by doing this he officially identified Israel, which is something, zero other Arab state has done. He realized very well that numerous Egyptians will probably be against his this step but due to the emblematic and historic value, being diplomatic with His home country of israel was one of many powerful cards that Sadat had that period. His trip was harmful as he him self was not sure; if his step of giving negotiating leverage will really bring good results.

Now the question is; if he was not sure if his approach will be useful or not, then why did he take it? The answer to this question is usually; because he was worried that there could be one more Geneva Conference. The initially Geneva Seminar was held in 1975, which will failed since parties could not reach to a mutual contract.

Sadat did not wanted to have another meeting because he has not been interested in dealing with the Soviets and having been also scared that if this Meeting will kept again than Egypt are not able to regain the control over Sinai Peninsula, which His home country of israel had taken from it in the war of 1967[footnoteRef: 3]. [3: Touval, Saadia. The Peace Broker agents. Princeton, NJ-NEW JERSEY: Princeton UP, 1982. Pg. 288. ]

Sadat knew well that the power of Egypt inside the Arab globe was eroding day by day. As a result he centered to reassert his command role to make this most effective strategy to be able to maintain great relationship with the United States and work with His home country of israel. This way this individual also got reduce the Geneva Process.

Sadat also realized that the Arabic world is not going to let him work together with Israel; therefore he attempted to make his trip in a dramatic move and gave it name of a serenity process. Furthermore, he as well knew well that people provide more importance to the emblematic gestures than to the top secret deals; consequently keeping in mind the psychological effects he made an increased visibility vacation to Jerusalem creating name of any peace treaty and tried to minimize the expected adverse reaction through the Arab World[footnoteRef: 4]. [4: Caplan, Neil and Eisenberg, Laura. Discussing Arab-Israeli Tranquility. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP, 1998. l. 39. ]

His gambling proved helpful and his keen in the Parliament of His home country of israel really performed a significant position in showing a new actuality to the Israelis. Begin was pressurized to take benefit from the new opportunity and move forward to get peace.

Sadat however , received a merged response from his country; some Egyptians expressed their particular support with this new stage taken by Leader while some did not appreciate this step at all. Whatever the response end up being; in first stage Sadat’s visit to Jerusalem did accomplish its absolute goal, which was to produce such an atmosphere for Come from which Commence could respond with obole of his own.


Sadat surely could make dominating strategy and take this step because fortunately it was in the benefit of home-based as well as international interests of Egypt. Our economy of Egypt had deteriorated badly during in the 70 due to the huge defense bills.

Sadat wanted to cover up for the deficits and he knew it turned out possible by simply two things; 1) Egypt gets high purchases from its friends and neighbors who are rich in petrol and 2) Egypt minimizes its army spending. Sadat could only cut his defence spending budget if he was assured that Israel will certainly no more give a threat to it; for that reason he agreed on this peacefulness treaty according to which Israel will take again its soldiers from Sinai Peninsula. Furthermore, he as well knew that every this was also not possible devoid of active role of United States;[footnoteRef: 5] as a result he attempted to maintain good relations with U. H. As well as His home country of israel in order to achieve his focuses on. [5: Stein, Janis Gross. “The Political Economic system of Reliability Agreements. ” Double-Edged Diplomacy. Ed. Philip B. Evans, Harold E. Jacobson, and Robert Deb. Putnam. Berkeley: California UP, 1993. pp. 77-103. ]

Bearing in mind all these details, Sadat built a diplomatic strategy to fulfill both, the Americans along with Arabs. Rewarding Americans was easy; simply by showing Israel’s narrow mindedness to People in the usa, but making Arabs cheerful was hard aim for him. This is because he previously already considered a step of recognizing Israel, which resulted in negative result of Arabs. To obtain his placement and support back, this individual wanted Israel to pull away from all territories that they occupied previously, so that Sadat can show and prove his concern for the home autonomy of Palestinians. In this way, Sadat made these two crucial goals while the bottom line at the Camp David.


The negotiations and the bargain process at Camp David was not a simple and straightforward issue being resolved. These kinds of negotiations were conducted in isolation; press was not permitted to attend the proceedings and members stayed at away from the exterior world.

The task lasted to get 13 days and nights with wide range of problems, misconceptions and shouts between the Silk and Judio Prime Ressortchef (umgangssprachlich). There was also a time when Sadat’s delegation got frustrated and started packing all their bags. Its almost semed impossible that these two celebrations could think of a mutual agreement but Leader Carter of United States achieved it possible. Although he was picked only being a mediator nevertheless for sure Us had personal interests inside the negotiations. President Carter discussed with every party singularly and after very long discussions of 13 times and lot of quarrels, finally they come to to some arrangement.


Finally two frontrunners signed a formal peace treaty and opted for normalize their very own relations. The

Related essay

Category: Government,

Topic: Country israel,

Words: 1720

Views: 294