Interpreting a cartoon story essay
Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch
Research from Dissertation:
stress and pleasure? Let us consider a joke with this topic, ahead of turning to severe theoretical approaches toward this issue. In a “Peanuts” cartoon tape by Charles M. Schultz, the strip’s resident know-it-all and novice psychiatrist, Lucy van Pelt, is seeing Charlie Brown’s dog Snoopy hopping about in a giddy dance of happiness. “How can you be cheerful when you how to start what this coming year has in store for you? ” she shouts. Snoopy looks chastened because Lucy proceeds, “Don’t you worry about everything that can happen? ” Snoopy looks troubled, or sick unto fatality, as Lucy says: “That’s betterlive in dread and fearbe smart. ” But in the strip’s final panel, Snoopy bursts out into joyful fun (“hehehe”) and begins his happy dance again. I’d like to approach this kind of cartoon remove as a very little parable, and evaluate this using two approaches to anxiety: the existential approach provided by Soren Kierkegaard in Fear and Moving, and the psychoanalytic approach taken by Freud in Civilization as well as Discontents.
Freud provides a valuable starting place, for the reason that Freudian idea of “angst vor etwas” or “fear just before something” is precisely what Lucy van Pelt is trying to get Snoopy to truly feel in this remove. Freud notoriously claims that most anxiety is definitely “angst vor etwas” – in other words, not necessarily only confrontational (I stand before contemporary society / I actually stand just before God and feel fear) but likewise anticipatory (I feel troubled before the event, my anxiety is an expectation) (Bloom 57). In Chapter VII of World and its Discontents, Freud describes the device of how this individual thinks anxiousness should run in civilization. The earliest form is “social anxiety” wherever people feel fear prior to opinion of others, and allow this kind of anxiety to control them (Freud 85). Freud thinks this is actually the principle that organizes almost all of society, but he as well believes there exists a “higher stage” in which this kind of anxiety and authority is basically internalized – we reply to an internal sense of fear, the voice of conscience, rather than an external feeling of interpersonal shame or perhaps social consequence for criminal offense. Part of the tall tale of the “Peanuts” comic is the fact, in some sense, it properly illustrates the dynamic of Freud’s model. Snoopy is usually happy at the beginning: Lucy won’t understand why. Thus Lucy subjects Snoopy to her opinion of his tendencies, and Snoopy complies with “social anxiety” to alter his behavior appropriately – he replaces his happiness with sorrow and worry. By third -panel, Snoopy seems to have internalized the origin of anxiety, to succeed in the level Freud and Lucy Van Pelt recommend – he taking walks away from Sharon, no longer requiring social existence to awaken the fear that produces him conform. Yet inside the final panel Snoopy provides seemingly noticed that his internalized conscience will no longer supports the fear: Snoopy is usually happy once again. From Freud’s standpoint, this might just be a lesson about the brief memories of dogs.
But is there yet another way that we can easily understand Snoopy’s journey right here, to pass through anxiety and be shocked by joy? I would suggest that the religious existential philosophy of Soren Kierkegaard provides an even better way of understanding Snoopy here. Kierkegaard reveals his thoughts through the hide of a ficticious name, Johannes sobre Silentio. In a few sense this can be an old-style church rollo, taking a passing from the Bible and analyzing it closely. The text may be the Genesis history of Abraham
