The Lego Group Case Study Essay

Profano bricks nonetheless hold particular meaning to many young adults with played with the bricks inside their teenage years. I, for just one, count amongst those adults as I was an avid enthusiast of Profano products myself: whenever there were new Seglar products unveiled, I used to nag my parents to get them for me and assured to be a ‘good boy’. Thus it emerged quite normal to me i wanted to check out the Profano group – the image of my childhood nostalgia – as a full case study statement for my personal Strategy for Innovative Technology Business class. Founded in 1932, the Seglar group was your world’s leading toy maker that was embodiment of dream and imagination to children.

Father and mother too, motivated by Lego’s brand graphic as ‘fostering mental development and creativity for kids’, patronized goods in spite of Lego’s relatively substantial prices. By the turn of the millennium, nevertheless , the changes in the toy industry coupled with expiration on their certificate, Lego faced huge challenged, reflected inside their net loss of 308 million Euros in the early 2000s. Nevertheless, Lego’s exemplarily strategic management practices under the CEO, Knudstorp brought the corporation back to splendour and as of 2014, Lego thrives yet again as the world’s best toy organization.

As such as is the case, this kind of essay shall examine Seglar groups ‘from riches to rags to riches’ tale with a unique focus on the strategic supervision process. Founded in 1932 by Ole Kirk Christiansen, the LEGO Group made wooden toys in the craftsmen shop in Billund, Denmark. LEGO was an abbreviated type of the Danish expression, “leg godt” (play well). Over the following 12-15 years, Christiansen’s business targeted around giving great items which supported ground breaking play. He composed his toys to enamor the creative capacity of the near by kids; through building, that they created a a sense of pride in achievement and learned whilst playing.

In the belief that he had found out the perfect new material pertaining to his producing organization, Christiansen purchased his initially plastic infusion embellishment equipment in 1947. The fateful result was LEGO’s renowned item, the plastic prevent with 8-10 studs, that this organization quickly applied for obvious in 1958. Afterwards, the Lego organization vehemently publicized their products using their pamphlets, contests and newsletters. It was this legacy – for quality, inventive play, group and experimentation – that Christiansen passed on to his children, who proceeded to claim and run the business. For the next 20 years, the LEGO Group developed little by little and constantly, arriving at basically 1 billion Danish kroner ex. moms in earnings 1978.

LEGO’s unique ‘play experience’ appealed to clients as it was targeted around free-structure play: Children built societe of their own selecting; they didn’t have to go through lengthy manual or suggestions. Over the following 10 years the corporation expanded around the world scale, raising sales to DKK your five billion in 1988. From 2000 the organization began had extra growth again as it began selling accredited products based upon intellectual house such as the Celebrity Wars videos. Based on these kinds of data and information it absolutely was relatively simple to generate a SWOT evaluation which can be illustrated in the graph and or chart below.

In 2003 the hazards innate in this development approach got to always be frighteningly legitimate. The SEGLAR Star Battles and SEGLAR Harry Potter units, whilst sold very well when all those movies were released, resulted in LEGO were dependent on those Hollywood films. In 2003 there was absence of a successful film such as Star Wars no Harry Knitter film as a result LEGO’s sales plummeted.

In addition to this was the ALL OF US dollar that started suffering from its 2002 making PROFANO products more expensive to ALL OF US customers. LEGOLAND parks had been making failures too, as well as the expenses of manufacturing more than 12, 500 distinct bricks stayed high. In 2003 and 2004 the business saw the greatest wrong doings ever, with its deficit documenting over 300 million Kroners. As its aggrevations got obvious and the top management started hunting down results and they realized that the gadget business was changing considerably in at least four techniques which was currently taking toll in LEGO’s future First and foremost, digital games, hand held devices, sites and even cellphones were decreasing the interest intended for customary toys and games.

Nobody recognized how far the company would fall, however everybody agreed that electronics might eventually supplant mechanical toys, making them out of date. Additionally , with kids needs to use multimedia devices such computer and mobile phones around the age of 8, they were dropping enthusiasm toward customary playthings. Secondly, the size of retail market, whose relationship was vital to SEGLAR, were changing as they converted into super stores, for example , Wal-Mart and Carrefour had an indisputably vast combination amount toys at inexpensive prices.

This kind of signified a power move from companies to retailer: those days that manufactures could dictate it is prices to customers, such as the sixties, were eliminated. Hence, doll producers required to fight for rack spaces, often at the expenditure of making a loss. Additionally, due to the new retail environment and the outsourcing of putting together to Asia, the plaything business confronted the huge require to cut straight down its rates.

Lastly, the LEGO Group started to notice that the less expensive, fake goods produced by other companies were flawlessly exchangeable with LEGO elements. These playthings were not only cheaper yet also quicker, offering things for sale to the public prior to LEGO may. The SEGLAR Groups sued those other LEGO suppliers in numerous international locations, contending the LEGO stop was an icon that ought to be properly secured by permanent trademark confidence, not brief, decade long patent security However , SEGLAR lost all its legal cases as it failed to persuade any kind of courts.

As a result, without any legal protection 2003 the PROFANO Group misplaced almost DKK 1 billion dollars kroner as well as cash control was perilously low. This is the biggest bad luck ever, a sign that numerous spectators believed LEGO was further than redemption. However, the loss for 2004 almost increased from prior years. Before you go into further detail on LEGO’s tactical management, a value chain research can be placed on illustrate the situation LEGO i visited.

The graph on the left illustrates the internal problems LEGO had, such as price in source and development line whilst inefficient make use of customer base in written below service portion. Likewise the graph around the right hand side reveals the solution for the people problem, including LEGO’s outsourcing strategy in supply level of value chain. Therefore both equally SWOT and value sequence analysis will help understanding LEGO case as well as implementation of stagey.

It was right now that 35 year old Knudstorp, who had created a decide to spare the organization, was selected president and CEO. In October 2004, the organization was into a poor situation. Competition was having fiercer than ever before and the toy business was advancing in ways that would not support the LEGO Group, and the business was almost bankrupt.

Besides, to Knudstorp. the organization got no crystal clear idea of whom it was neither what products it ought to offer. It absolutely was clear to everybody that changes had been required. Knudstorp and a few several associates in 2004 figured another strategy for the corporation. Their thought had 3 stages.

In the beginning, they required to enhance the organization’s money circulation and eliminate debt; much of this, they will proclaimed, can be achieved by auctioning off non-vital holdings,  lessening operational price and outsourced workers manufacturing method. Second, to make net income, they necessary to expand their product offerings. Lastly, the corporation needed to develop naturally, to assume better techniques for creating value. Before the end of 2005, they had done the significant goals of the initial stage, and it was time to start the 2nd and third stages.

Having a PhD in Economics, Knudstorp had performed at Mckinsey & Co for three years, then joined up with the LEGO Group like a Strategy exec in 2001. Knudstorp entitled their fresh plan “Shared Vision. ” Knudstorp defined it not an additional procedure, rather as a task plan for survival that depending on LEGO’s famous strengths. The arrangement had three parts. The primary level, ‘Stabilize for Survival, ” was to be achieved in 2005 and june 2006, and targeted on decreasing cost, disposing of debts and reinstating earnings to LEGO.

The second level, “Profit from the Core, ” to be completed in 2006 and 2007, supposed to enhance the efficiency and development of the organization simply by revitalizing the middle product offerings and transforming the business level through freelancing of putting together and considerable use of the IT. The last stage, “Accomplishing Vision, ” aimed pertaining to 2008 and 2009, concentrated on creating inventive fresh play products that could power LEGO’s situation in the market. The LEGO Group instantly begun to diminish debts and slice expenses.

In 2004 this began outsourcing techniques of most of its plastic-type material block building to exterior suppliers or its own development lines in nations in whose labor was cheap, just like Vietnam. Hence, LEGO terminated half of the employees and blue collar workers it directly utilized. In 2006, LEGO announced that 80 percent of development would go on to nations in Eastern The european union and South america for cheap labor. In addition , the LEGO Group sold a 70% shares of the four Legolands towards the Blackstone Group for $456 million.

To diminish production and assembling expenses, it began decreasing the inventory of LEGO parts. Knudstorp great group realized that diminishing the quantity of parts can be strongly opposed in LEGO’s Design Division and could also harm the organization’s image. A few designers contended it would destroy imaginative meaning of SEGLAR products and lessen the amount of products available, which would reduced incomes for LEGO Group. Yet a lessening in segments could streamline generating operations, cut inventories, decrease expense of old products, minimize mold conjecture cost substantially and unburden distribution network. The group tasked while using exertion acknowledged that a range of the segments were needless and damage the organization’s profits.

For example, the prepare food character puppet had several distinctive faces, each a single made by a different segment plus the group believed one was enough. Lessening the current range of 12, five-hundred parts by simply to 1 / 2, the group guessed, might compel the designers to concentrate and make almost all of what they have got. Before the end of 2006 the LEGO Group received through its immediate turmoil.

Despite the fact that revenue were actually because of the discontinuation of a few products, the organization experienced relatively safe cash quantity. Besides, expenses were down 35% and LEGO acquired zero debts. As Period 2 of Shared Vision started, the corporation targeted revitalizing its item offerings and gain profit.

The product lines were re-examined to show gainful profit. The management team additionally was concerned that how they would execute another period of the Shared Eye-sight new thoughts for natural development that was designed to start in 2008. One product supplying that required revitalization was LEGO Metropolis.

Although it was one of the most ancient and best product offerings of the organization, LEGO Town products had been declining as 2000 and some thought the merchandise offering needs to be eliminated. The money share of the product for the organization’s declined from 15% to several % in 2003. In 2004 SEGLAR City promoting chief, Birthe Jensen, asked her group to reflect on and ascertain the product whether to be ongoing.

As a result, it absolutely was found out that they, were not differentiated enough and lacked target to attract consumers. To wake up and go, Jensen and her group chose they can create even more sensible products, more appealing features to kids that could offer immediate fulfillment. At the end of 2005, with all the organization on the robust financial balance, Knudstorp considered up coming action plan. Revenue had lowered by 35% in the past two years, and the business was all the while conforming for the reduction in work force. The reduction in LEGO sections was also being experienced, inside and out of doors the organization.

Designers whined that their ingenuity was being decreased, and some fervent clients grumbled when their very own most adored segments or figures were not produced anymore. Of Course , the group contemplated how LEGO’s designers would respond to reducing amount of parts accessible to all of them. Thus the management team decided to test their designers to find out in case the toys had been developed only from the parts accessible might that considerably decrease LEGO’s product top quality. Knudstorp and his group similarly understood that they can required to improve improvement adequacy. It was vital to create fresh toy item as well as the up and the lastest of well-known products including Bionicle, Exoforce, LEGO City, Harry Knitter Star War and different gadgets.

In order to increase the item advancement and improvement procedure the corporation had accomplished a stage-entryway handle in 1995, referred to as the SEGLAR Development Procedure (LDP), to boost the speed of introduction of things to market. However , in the course of recent times, the LDP had degenerated into a great unwieldy paperwork. For an item to creation, fancy agendas must be round out, every planner and designer was required to fill in paperwork and checklist many times before endorsement. As mentioned by Per Hjuler, VP of item improvement, at first it worked well, however it got excessively cumbersome.

SEGLAR also acquired another critical issue with its success rate of new product development. Delivering a new item to market got about 36 months. By 2003, as suggested by Hjuler, “one and later or two” of five new item thoughts made it to sell. Thus that they had to enhance the procedure making it faster and more successful. Notwithstanding being moderate, the product improvement treatment experienced a reduction in accomplishment in creating and bringing to market drastically new thoughts.

In order to address this problem, LEGO acquired made an idea Lab, in whose role was going to create intensifying products that might prove to be disruptively innovative. Invisalign was seen as an free reference to others, and Concept Research laboratory staff frequently got as part of the advancement of more incremental item concepts. This bad use of personnel, coupled with the problem of finding away ideas through the LEGO Group’s complex expansion procedure, clogged successful operation of the Concept Lab. Another open door for advancement was in the territory of licensing.

Even though the organization shed many lawsuits in creating trademarks, it concurred that there was even now a business prospect in licensing the PROFANO brands to outside goods by partnership. These partner organizations could make books, movies, workstation recreation, T-shirts and different items about brands, for example , Bionicle, Exoforce and PROFANO Star Battle. LEGO on top of that longed to review whether it could enlarge it is inside expansion team with outside trailblazers. Yet in both cases, it necessary to guarantee that the products produced had been safe together with the brand picture of every product offering and never stolen by simply outsiders.

Consideringg its pursuit, the organization furthermore realized that it was not using its intensive passionate customer based. For instance, LEGO recently made an internet design system called SEGLAR Digital Designer, which permitted clients to make new PROFANO toys fundamentally. So each customer could create a new PROFANO toy in accordance to their preferences and find out rates to produce them.

In addition they likewise launched one other service called LEGO Stock which allow clients to get different clients’ products. As the logistics from the shipment and mass production of these units was still becoming worked on, the organization saw amazing potential and gradually began working on it. Subsequently, LEGO’s new proper management strategy, ‘Shared Vision’ proved their worth when it was verified that LEGO was clearly back on the right track through it is revenue and market share. As of 2008, the results of ‘Shared Vision’ strategy were in.

While there remained much more to accomplish, it had been explicitly noticeable that Knudstorp plan worked well for the LEGO Group’s recover. By simply restructuring the corporation, redefining the innovation method, connecting with outside creation partners, and putting in place many mechanisms to coordinate innovation efforts, the corporation had turned its go and said itself since the world’s most rewarding toy company. Sales gone up also overall, and projects to revitalize brands such as SEGLAR City and Bionicle concluded as wonderful success and their products had been always very well sought out. In addition, the relaunch of SEGLAR Mindstorms co-developed with a ardent group of outdoors enthusiasts far exceeded its initial expectation, selling more than 150, 000 units in 2007.

Aside from sales characters, the company experienced introduced a few toys depending on LEGO Stock designs that actively urged customer contribution and the services was developing well, causing enhanced brand image of SEGLAR. In addition , the corporation planted more business ideas in the pipeline that could lead to even more growth, including an online multi-player game to become called LEGO Universe, which might serve as a sales platform for its customers. All was good and Lego’s dominance was indisputable. In conclusion, it seems like reasonable to me to conclude that Knudstorp organization strategy of ‘Shared Vision’ proved successful in brining about LEGO’s revival and recovery.

LEGO’s ‘riches to rags and to riches’ history has become a legendary history of hero’s return to the world’s toy market. The shared eyesight clearly displays combination of cost leadership and product difference, two essential principal desired goals of managing which were attacked concurrently for LEGO by Knudstorp. Many organisations that depend on selling relatively outdated items, such older toys or perhaps antique pieces of furniture, fountain pens ought to study from LEGO’s exemplary success in exploring ‘the new’ via, the old, creating value among.

Therefore , all those companies should rather, we have to make it a duty to attract lesson from Lego’s example as a powerful model to adhere to. Bibliography.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Your time is important. Let us write you an essay from scratch

Get essay help

Related essay